Thursday, February 9, 2012

Trucks! – M2 Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicle

September 1, 2010 by exoe  
Filed under Trucks


Trucks! gives a nuts & bolts gearhead review of the Bradley’s engine, transmission and drivetrain, then takes it for an off-road spin. That Cummins VTA-903T Engine is a 903 cubic inch 4-cycle V8 turbosupercharged diesel putting out a max 500hp and 1200 ft-lbs of torque. Name : M2/M3 Bradley Fighting Vehicle Purpose : Infantry Transport/Support Crew : Three Man Team Soldier Capacity : – M2 : Six Man Infantry Team – M3 : Two Man Scout Team Engine : VTA-903T Diesel Transmission: HMPT-500 three speed hydro mechanical Length : 21′ Width : 10′ – 6″ Height : 10′ Weight : 50000 Lbs Weapons: – 1 M242 25mm Chain Gun – 1 M240C 7.62mm Machine Gun – 2 M257 Smoke Grenade Dischargers – 1 TOW Anti-Tank Missile System Top Land Speed : 66 Km/Hour Top Water Speed : 7.2 Km/Hour – apologies the the poor audio sync, was a problem converting the source video.

Comments

25 Responses to “Trucks! – M2 Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicle”
  1. 555banzai says:

    nice specification on the bradley in the description :)

  2. cjhyde78 says:

    I drove on in Ft Benning and it does NOT have a yoke it has a steering wheel? dumb ass

  3. M4aster says:

    that things a POS.
    a state of the art POS.

  4. Skid00everest340 says:

    the swedish cv 90 is way better it got a scania v8 and a 40 mm and got capability to change whate heck the round is gonna do when coming near the target and without the safety thingy that calms down the engine and transmission you will get 730 hp but there a catch more hp and torque more wear and tear on the engine and transmission. and you got 3 more types of the cv 90 one is a tank destroyer and one is made for firing mortars and the last one a self prepelde AA gun. and i been iside one

  5. lken14 says:

    Where was this video taken?

  6. moremadnessful says:

    My brother drive’s this in iraq

  7. DonMeaker says:

    @purerage1974 Depends on the kind of fight. on a flat billiard table, bet on the M-1, in rough or urban terrain, the Bradley would disgorge its infantry squad, lay a few mines. and cover the obstacle with fire. Tough time getting across the mine field.

  8. XxMusashiYamatoxX says:

    @hedus42 – It is NOT an APC cockhead

  9. CharlieDoan says:

    too small Cannon and need more machine guns on top and around

  10. purerage1974 says:

    HEDUS42 NO SHIT AN M1 WOULD WIN THE FIGHT THE BRADLEY IS NOT A TANK ITS AN INFANTRY FIGHTING VEHICLE THE BRADLEY AND M1 WORK IN CONCERT COVERING EACH OTHER ALONG WITH THE 6 DISMOUNTS THE BRADLEY CARRIES

  11. hedus42 says:

    the bradley is the kind of APC that can do many things ok, but cant do any of them very well………. and for the people that says it took many tanks, you should notice that they where outdated tanks, i will like to see it against m1 , challenger or leopard…………

  12. dalekrueger says:

    truckers used to call the 903 cummins”903 nothin”,they didn’t have much lug

  13. Tyco200 says:

    @TheRealJohnHoward The Abrams nearly took a whole fraction of Sadam’s tank forces. The M2/M3 bradely is effective against tanks, but up close? The armor is too thin to resist something like a 125MM smooth-bore gun.

  14. TheRealJohnHoward says:

    @Tyco200 Bradley’s took out more tanks in desert storm then Abrams did

  15. Tyco200 says:

    Bradely APC = big balls against infantry. Against tank? … Balls shrink!

  16. mekazou409 says:

    i love the bradley

  17. wolfyys says:

    “the bradley has to be the ultimate off road vehicle”

    Id say the ultimate offroad vehicle goes to the BV206, that vehicle can go just about anywhere.

  18. yamahonkawazuki says:

    @Nza420 ahh kk. i watch this program. and thought to self. what vehicles this guy gets into or under or whatnot. , it has to be somewhat uncomfortable

  19. Nza420 says:

    @yamahonkawazuki super tight jeans

  20. yamahonkawazuki says:

    @Nza420 Might i ask what that means?, never heard that term before lol

  21. yamahonkawazuki says:

    @MagnumPI4 hell between 1 and now been almost 2 decades

  22. macuss87 says:

    not bad, but i’d still perfer a hornet!

  23. englandisthebest01 says:

    Love the TOW system. Britain is still best, but not at making apcs.

  24. wetaconce says:

    enemy APC SPOTED!!!!

  25. gosciu555 says:

    Not really, they actually sucked at opression, I would say the British oligarchy is much better.

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

You must be logged in to post a comment.